On Friday, February 09, 2018 05:02:00 PM John R. Levine wrote:
If I may once again change the topic for a moment ...
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-levine-appsarea-eaiauth/
I pushed out a new version that says something about SPF macros,
attempting to say that if you try to expand a UTF-8 local part, it doesn't
match anything. I figure this is consistent with what would happen if
your local part was something like foo..bar which won't match anything
either.
I would appreciate if people would take a look and see if anything seems
obviously wrong. I'm doing some EAI whitepapery things for ICANN and it
would be nice if, for a change, the advice they offer matches reality.
Thanks. I think that's a reasonable resolution of the SPF macro issue that I
raised. Not ideal, in theory, but plenty good enough for the corner case it
is.
Does this need to update RFC 7208 since there are SPF related MUST
requirements?
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html