On 02/10/2018 10:22 AM, Dave Crocker wrote:
On 2/10/2018 10:12 AM, Michael Thomas wrote:
DKIM-Signature-v2: vs DKIM-Signature: v=2;
Angels, meet the pinhead.
equal semantics does not mean equal implementation. the processing
for each of these takes place in very different parts of the system.
the latter requires new code, albeit internal to the DKIM module. the
former merely requires a new table entry.
I don't know when the last time you've written a line of code (my last
time was about 5 minutes ago), but this is just silly.
It makes not a particle of difference code-wise, but it would require
reconfiguration of the mailer configurations for a new
header. I'll take that back, code-wise. My assumption is that the actual
header is passed into the DKIM library. If that's not
true, it would be more work vs. v=2. But I still think this entire
conversation is silly in its theoreticality.
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to