RE: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol

--- Craig McGregor <Craig(_dot_)McGregor(_at_)treasury(_dot_)govt(_dot_)nz> 
wrote:
> S/MIME has loads 
> of running code, is present in existing product libraries and is
> proven
> to robust survivability through an array of e-mail transmission
> scenerios. Much more than a "niche" player I wouldn't you think?

I'm confused.  If S/Mime has such wide adoption and integration today,
email forgery shouldn't exist.  Yet it does.  Why?  

miles