IETF Mailsig (thread)
CircleID on DomainKeys,
Andrew Newton,
2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, Jose Marcio Martins da Cruz, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, domainkeys-feedbackbase01, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, David Woodhouse, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, Justin Mason, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, David Woodhouse, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, David Woodhouse, 2004/10/28
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, Rand Wacker, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, Tony Finch, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, David Woodhouse, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, David Woodhouse, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, John Dennis, 2004/10/28
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, David Woodhouse, 2004/10/28
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/28
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, John Dennis, 2004/10/28
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, David Woodhouse, 2004/10/28
- Mailing lists and signatures (was: Re: CircleID on DomainKeys), Jim Fenton, 2004/10/27
- Re: Mailing lists and signatures (was: Re: CircleID on DomainKeys), David Woodhouse, 2004/10/28
- Re: Mailing lists and signatures (was: Re: CircleID on DomainKeys), william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/28
- Re: Mailing lists and signatures (was: Re: CircleID on DomainKeys), Jose Marcio Martins da Cruz, 2004/10/28
- Re: Mailing lists and signatures (was: Re: CircleID on DomainKeys), David Woodhouse, 2004/10/28
- Re: Mailing lists and signatures (was: Re: CircleID on DomainKeys), Jim Fenton, 2004/10/28
- Re: Mailing lists and signatures (was: Re: CircleID on DomainKeys), John Levine, 2004/10/30
- Re: Mailing lists and signatures (was: Re: CircleID on DomainKeys), Jim Fenton, 2004/10/31
- Re: Mailing lists and signatures (was: Re: CircleID on DomainKeys), Jim Fenton, 2004/10/28
- simplicity, focus and adoption; what problem are we trying to solve?, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/28
- Re: simplicity, focus and adoption; what problem are we trying to solve?, David Woodhouse, 2004/10/28
- Re: simplicity, focus and adoption; what problem are we trying to solve?, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2004/10/28
- simplicity, focus and adoption; what problem are we trying to solve?, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/28
- Re: simplicity, focus and adoption; what problem are we trying to solve?, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/28
- Re: simplicity, focus and adoption; what problem are we trying to solve?, David Woodhouse, 2004/10/28
- Re: simplicity, focus and adoption; what problem are we trying to solve?, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/28
- Re: simplicity, focus and adoption; what problem are we trying to solve?, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/29
- Re: simplicity, focus and adoption; what problem are we trying to solve?, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/29
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, Rand Wacker, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, David Woodhouse, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, Jose Marcio Martins da Cruz, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, David Woodhouse, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, Jose Marcio Martins da Cruz, 2004/10/27
- Re: CircleID on DomainKeys, Murray S. Kucherawy, 2004/10/27
- RE: CircleID on DomainKeys, Paul Lambert, 2004/10/27
Question about fenton-identified-mail-01,
Cullen Jennings,
2004/10/22
- Re: Question about fenton-identified-mail-01, domainkeys-feedbackbase01, 2004/10/22
- Re: Question about fenton-identified-mail-01, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/22
- Re: Question about fenton-identified-mail-01, domainkeys-feedbackbase01, 2004/10/22
- Re: Question about fenton-identified-mail-01, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/22
- Re: Question about fenton-identified-mail-01, Miles Libbey, 2004/10/22
- Re: Question about fenton-identified-mail-01, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/22
- Re: Question about fenton-identified-mail-01, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/25
- Re: Question about fenton-identified-mail-01, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/25
- Re: Question about fenton-identified-mail-01, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/23
- Re: Question about fenton-identified-mail-01, domainkeys-feedbackbase01, 2004/10/22
- Re: Question about fenton-identified-mail-01, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/22
- Question about fenton-identified-mail-01, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/22
- Re: Question about fenton-identified-mail-01, Cullen Jennings, 2004/10/24
- RE: Question about fenton-identified-mail-01, Peterson, Jon, 2004/10/25
a draft on messaging, impersonation and identity,
Peterson, Jon,
2004/10/16
- Re: a draft on messaging, impersonation and identity, George Gross, 2004/10/16
- RE: a draft on messaging, impersonation and identity, Peterson, Jon, 2004/10/16
- RE: a draft on messaging, impersonation and identity, Peterson, Jon, 2004/10/17
- RE: a draft on messaging, impersonation and identity, Peterson, Jon, 2004/10/17
- RE: a draft on messaging, impersonation and identity, Peterson, Jon, 2004/10/17
Ways to proceed,
Hallam-Baker, Phillip,
2004/10/13
- Re: Ways to proceed, John Levine, 2004/10/13
- RE: Ways to proceed, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/10/14
- RE: Ways to proceed, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/10/14
- RE: Ways to proceed, Atul.Sharma, 2004/10/14
- RE: Ways to proceed, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/10/14
- RE: Ways to proceed, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/10/14
- RE: Ways to proceed, Atul.Sharma, 2004/10/14
- RE: Ways to proceed, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 2004/10/14
- RE: Ways to proceed, Paul Lambert, 2004/10/15
semantics of the signature,
James M Galvin,
2004/10/06
- Re: semantics of the signature, Tony Finch, 2004/10/06
- Re: semantics of the signature, James M Galvin, 2004/10/07
- Re: semantics of the signature, Tony Finch, 2004/10/07
- RE: semantics of the signature, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/07
- RE: semantics of the signature, Tony Finch, 2004/10/07
- RE: semantics of the signature, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/07
- RE: semantics of the signature, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/07
- RE: semantics of the signature, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/07
- RE: semantics of the signature, Tony Finch, 2004/10/08
- RE: semantics of the signature, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/08
- Re: semantics of the signature, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/07
- Re: semantics of the signature, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/07
- Re: semantics of the signature, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/07
- Re: semantics of the signature, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/07
- Anonymity use cases, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/07
- Re: Anonymity use cases, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/08
- Re: Anonymity use cases, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/08
- Mandating MIME, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/07
- Re: Mandating MIME, John Levine, 2004/10/07
- Re: Mandating MIME, James M Galvin, 2004/10/08
- Re: Mandating MIME, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/08
- Re: Mandating MIME, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/08
- RE: Mandating MIME, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/09
- Re: semantics of the signature, James M Galvin, 2004/10/08
- Re: semantics of the signature, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/08
- Re: semantics of the signature, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/08
- Re: semantics of the signature, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/08
- Re: semantics of the signature, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/09
- Re: semantics of the signature, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/09
- Re: semantics of the signature, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/09
- Re: semantics of the signature, James M Galvin, 2004/10/08
- Re: semantics of the signature, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/08
- Re: semantics of the signature, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/08
- Re: semantics of the signature, James M Galvin, 2004/10/08
- Re: semantics of the signature, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/09
- Re: semantics of the signature, James M Galvin, 2004/10/09
- Re: what MTAs do, was semantics of the signature, John Levine, 2004/10/09
- Re: what MTAs do, was semantics of the signature, James M Galvin, 2004/10/10
- Re: what MTAs do, was semantics of the signature, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/10
- Re: what MTAs do, was semantics of the signature, James M Galvin, 2004/10/10
- Re: what MTAs do, was semantics of the signature, John R Levine, 2004/10/10
- RE: what MTAs do, was semantics of the signature, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/10
- Re: semantics of the signature, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/08
RE: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol,
Craig McGregor,
2004/10/05
- RE: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Craig McGregor, 2004/10/05
- RE: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Craig McGregor, 2004/10/06
- RE: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, domainkeys-feedbackbase01, 2004/10/06
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/07
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, domainkeys-feedbackbase01, 2004/10/07
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/07
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/08
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/08
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/08
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/10
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/07
- RE: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Miles Libbey, 2004/10/07
Re: Anonymous signed mail,
domainkeys-feedbackbase01,
2004/10/01
- Re: Anonymous signed mail, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/01
- Re: Anonymous signed mail, Miles Libbey, 2004/10/01
- Re: Anonymous signed mail, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/02
- Re: Anonymous signed mail, Miles Libbey, 2004/10/02
- Re: Anonymous signed mail, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/02
- Re: Anonymous signed mail, wayne, 2004/10/02
- Re: Anonymous signed mail, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/05
- costs of different approaches, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/02
- Re: costs of different approaches, Rand Wacker, 2004/10/04
- Re: costs of different approaches, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/05
- Re: costs of different approaches, Carl Hutzler, 2004/10/06
- Re: costs of different approaches, Rand Wacker, 2004/10/06
- Re: costs of different approaches, Carl Hutzler, 2004/10/06
- Re: costs of different approaches, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/06
- Re: costs of different approaches, wayne, 2004/10/07
- Re: costs of different approaches, Rand Wacker, 2004/10/07
- Re: costs of different approaches, wayne, 2004/10/07
- Re: Anonymous signed mail, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/06
- Re: Anonymous signed mail, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/06
- Re: Anonymous signed mail, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/06
- Re: Anonymous signed mail, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/06
- Re: Anonymous signed mail, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/06
- Re: Anonymous signed mail, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/06
- Re: the DNS issue, John Levine, 2004/10/06
Re: Why we don't require requirements,
domainkeys-feedbackbase01,
2004/09/30
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, Dave Crocker, 2004/09/30
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/01
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, James M Galvin, 2004/10/01
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, John Levine, 2004/10/01
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, James M Galvin, 2004/10/01
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, Tony Finch, 2004/10/01
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, James M Galvin, 2004/10/03
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/01
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, wayne, 2004/10/01
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/01
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, John Levine, 2004/10/01
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/02
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, ned . freed, 2004/10/02
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, John Levine, 2004/10/02
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, ned . freed, 2004/10/02
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/05
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, James M Galvin, 2004/10/03
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, George Gross, 2004/10/03
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, John Levine, 2004/10/03
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/06
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, domainkeys-feedbackbase01, 2004/10/03
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, George Gross, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, Jon Callas, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, George Gross, 2004/10/05
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, John R Levine, 2004/10/08
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/10
- Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, John R Levine, 2004/10/10
- Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/10
- Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, John R Levine, 2004/10/10
- Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/10
- Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, John R Levine, 2004/10/10
- Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/10
- Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, John R Levine, 2004/10/10
- Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/10
- Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/10
- Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/10
- Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/11
- Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/11
- Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/11
- Requiring no MIME support, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/11
- Re: Requiring no MIME support, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/11
- Re: Requiring no MIME support, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/11
- Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, John R Levine, 2004/10/11
- Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, James M Galvin, 2004/10/12
- Re: transition to MASS, was Why we really don't require requirements, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/12
- Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/04
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, John Levine, 2004/10/04
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/05
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, John R Levine, 2004/10/05
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/06
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/06
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/06
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Miles Libbey, 2004/10/06
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, domainkeys-feedbackbase01, 2004/10/06
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, John R Levine, 2004/10/06
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/05
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, James M Galvin, 2004/10/05
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/05
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/05
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/05
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, James M Galvin, 2004/10/06
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, James M Galvin, 2004/10/06
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Tony Finch, 2004/10/06
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, David Woodhouse, 2004/10/08
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, James M Galvin, 2004/10/06
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/06
- RE: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, James Scott, 2004/10/05
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/06
- Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, David Woodhouse, 2004/10/08
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, Andrew Newton, 2004/10/04
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/02
- Re: Why we really don't require requirements, James M Galvin, 2004/10/03
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, James M Galvin, 2004/10/03
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, James M Galvin, 2004/10/03
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, domainkeys-feedbackbase01, 2004/10/01
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, ned . freed, 2004/10/01
- charter constraints list, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/02
- RE: charter constraints list, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/02
- RE: charter constraints list, Dave Crocker, 2004/10/02
- RE: charter constraints list, Miles Libbey, 2004/10/02
- RE: charter constraints list, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/03
- RE: charter constraints list, George Gross, 2004/10/03
- RE: charter constraints list, domainkeys-feedbackbase01, 2004/10/03
- RE: charter constraints list, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/05
- RE: charter constraints list, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/05
- RE: charter constraints list, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/06
- RE: charter constraints list, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/06
- RE: charter constraints list, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/06
- RE: charter constraints list, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/06
- RE: charter constraints list, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/09
- RE: charter constraints list, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/09
- RE: charter constraints list, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/09
- RE: charter constraints list, Seth Goodman, 2004/10/09
- RE: charter constraints list, Michael Thomas, 2004/10/09
- RE: charter constraints list, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/10
- Re: charter constraints list, ned . freed, 2004/10/02
- Re: charter constraints list, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/05
- anonymity, Tony Finch, 2004/10/06
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/06
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, Jim Fenton, 2004/10/05
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, David Woodhouse, 2004/10/01
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, wayne, 2004/10/01
- RE: Why we don't require requirements, Paul Lambert, 2004/10/01
- Re: Why we don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net, 2004/10/06