If that is so, then we cannot risk time on a new scheme; we must limit the scope of the charter to S/MIME or PGP.
At the MASS BOF there were at least six proposals, none of which were S/MIME or PGP. Most of them exist in prototype form, some have been in production for several years. Are you saying that we're not allowed to look at those?
Previous by Date: | Re: Why we really don't require requirements, Jon Callas |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Why we really don't require requirements, George Gross |
Previous by Thread: | Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Andrew Newton |
Next by Thread: | Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Andrew Newton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |