On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, Dave Crocker wrote:
On Tue, 05 Oct 2004 16:16:02 -0700, Jim Fenton wrote:
> At 02:31 PM 10/5/2004 -0700, Dave Crocker wrote:
> > > In the small we are talking about a signature that is
> > > valid from an initiator to a responder, and then
> > > discarded by the responder. It creates a new signature
> > > as an initiator for the next responder.
> > >
> >
> > i think that accurately represents the current proposals.
> >
> > does anyone disagree?
> >
> Depends on what you mean by an initiator and responder.
Given the term "responder", I assumed this mean classic email
originator and recipient.
No. I meant hop-by-hop. I was trying to refer to each connection along
the path.
Jim