On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 16:03 +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
I don't think we should be discarding signatures anywhere. In the event of resending (in the sense of RFC(2)822.Resent- headers) there should perhaps be N+1 signatures, one for the 822.Sender: and one for each of the N resendings.
Agreed. -- dwmw2
| Previous by Date: | Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, David Woodhouse |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Michael Thomas |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Tony Finch |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, James M Galvin |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |