On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, John Levine wrote: As I've said before, I think that Dave's proposed charter is specific enough, and we should start looking at the merits and weaknesses of the proposals. I can not support the charter as long as it allows this group to create a new email signature protocol. If I'm alone or even a minority in that view, ship it to the IESG. I'll make my comments again during "Last Call." If others agree with me now would be a good time to speak up. Jim
Previous by Date: | Re: Why we really don't require requirements, James M Galvin |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Michael Thomas |
Previous by Thread: | Re: Why we really don't require requirements, Jim Fenton |
Next by Thread: | Re: Why we really don't require requirements, George Gross |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |