On Sat, 2 Oct 2004, John Levine wrote:
    As I've said before, I think that Dave's proposed charter is specific
    enough, and we should start looking at the merits and weaknesses of
    the proposals.
I can not support the charter as long as it allows this group to create
a new email signature protocol.
If I'm alone or even a minority in that view, ship it to the IESG.  I'll
make my comments again during "Last Call."
If others agree with me now would be a good time to speak up.
Jim
| Previous by Date: | Re: Why we really don't require requirements, James M Galvin | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Rambings on RFC2822 signatures., Michael Thomas | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Why we really don't require requirements, Jim Fenton | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: Why we really don't require requirements, George Gross | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |