Re: Anonymous signed mail

ietf-mailsig

Re: Anonymous signed mail

2004-10-06 06:50:34



On Oct 6, 2004, at 6:13 AM, william(at)elan.net wrote:

By saying that TXT is inappropriate you are effectively saying thatany
solution that uses the DNS is 5-10 years from practical deployment.
You're greatly greatly overestimating the problem with new dns types.


I agree.

-andy

[More with this subject...]

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: costs of different approaches, (continued) Re: costs of different approaches, Rand Wacker Re: costs of different approaches, Michael Thomas Re: costs of different approaches, Carl Hutzler Re: costs of different approaches, Rand Wacker Re: costs of different approaches, Carl Hutzler Re: costs of different approaches, william(at)elan.net Re: costs of different approaches, wayne Re: costs of different approaches, Rand Wacker Re: costs of different approaches, wayne Re: Anonymous signed mail, william(at)elan.net Re: Anonymous signed mail, Andrew Newton <= Re: Anonymous signed mail, Michael Thomas Re: Anonymous signed mail, william(at)elan.net Re: Anonymous signed mail, Andrew Newton Re: Anonymous signed mail, Michael Thomas Re: the DNS issue, John Levine

Previous by Date:	Re: Why we really don't require requirements, william(at)elan.net
Next by Date:	Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Andrew Newton
Previous by Thread:	Re: Anonymous signed mail, william(at)elan.net
Next by Thread:	Re: Anonymous signed mail, Michael Thomas
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]