Re: Why we don't require requirements

On Oct 1, 2004, at 3:20 AM, william(at)elan.net wrote:

> I agree. There is a chance that none of the proposals would meet our
> requirements but that parts of some would and it could be possible
> to create something new out of those parts of just something new 
> entirely.
> If we come to that such a point we must have an option to do it, but
> at the same time, this should not be preferred option (i.e. we
> must evaluate what we already have first).

+1

-andy