On Thu, 30 Sep 2004 23:07:43 -0700 (PDT),
domainkeys-feedbackbase01(_at_)yahoo(_dot_)com wrote:
--- Dave Crocker <dhc(_at_)dcrocker(_dot_)net> wrote:
On 1 Oct 2004 03:56:22 -0000, John Levine wrote:
Pardon my ignorance but what proposals are likely to
be considered by MASS? Which ones have been moved
to CLEAR?
There were a bunch presented at the MASS BOF at IETF
60. See the draft minutes at http://www.imc.org/ietf-
mailsig/mail- archive/msg00025.html
1. "These distinctive requirements and characteristics may
include:"
Is it too specific to add that non-participants should not be
disadvantaged? That is to say, that any encapsulation form
should not be unrecognizable to non-participants?
actually, that's a very important point, such as biasing towards
headers for attributes, rather than a special mime body-part
type.
2. "The following work items are explicitly ruled out of the
scope of MASS:
- Address-based authentication"
Again it's my denseness, but can you elaborate on what this
means?
damn. this is still causing problems for people.
it is meant to exclude ip addresses as the basis for
authentication. i guess i shouldn't have used such cryptic
language.
d/