On Oct 8, 2004, at 3:50 PM, James M Galvin wrote:
If I've got all that right, then what I would most like to see the
Charter say is two things.
First, developing an end-user to end-user signature mechanism is
explicitly out-of-scope.
Second, the purpose of this working group is to develop an end-MTA to
end-MTA signature mechanism.
I agree with this.
On Oct 8, 2004, at 4:44 PM, william(at)elan.net wrote:
I'm okay with all other issues being left for debate.
That is why we need requirements to come up with list of issues that
our
working group will want to solve as part of MTA-MTA signature
verification
system.
And this.
-andy