Re: semantics of the signature




On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 09:55:51 -0400 (EDT), James M Galvin wrote:

 Dave, you're the guy with the "edit token" on the charter.  
 What's your opinion?


i'm taking folks' comments and working on a revised draft 
charter.

d/

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: semantics of the signature, (continued) Re: semantics of the signature, James M Galvin Re: semantics of the signature, James M Galvin Re: semantics of the signature, Tony Finch RE: semantics of the signature, Seth Goodman RE: semantics of the signature, Tony Finch RE: semantics of the signature, Seth Goodman RE: semantics of the signature, Michael Thomas RE: semantics of the signature, Seth Goodman RE: semantics of the signature, Tony Finch RE: semantics of the signature, Seth Goodman Re: semantics of the signature, Dave Crocker <= Re: semantics of the signature, Andrew Newton Re: semantics of the signature, Jim Fenton Re: semantics of the signature, Andrew Newton Anonymity use cases, Jim Fenton Re: Anonymity use cases, Andrew Newton Re: Anonymity use cases, Jim Fenton Mandating MIME, Jim Fenton Re: Mandating MIME, John Levine Re: Mandating MIME, James M Galvin Re: Mandating MIME, Dave Crocker

Previous by Date:	Re: Narrow the scope: no new email signature protocol, Dave Crocker
Next by Date:	RE: semantics of the signature, Tony Finch
Previous by Thread:	RE: semantics of the signature, Seth Goodman
Next by Thread:	Re: semantics of the signature, Andrew Newton
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]