Re: one more time: agreeing on the basic goal of MASS

Robert Barclay wrote:

> Jim Fenton wrote:
>
> > You're right, it doesn't flow as well.  Also, if I read it carefully, 
> > it tends to sound like the authorization is necessarily for any 
> > address under the domain.  Granularity to individual addresses is 
> > important too.
> >
> > -Jim
> Even in the case of per user keys it is presumably the domain 
> providing those keys and thus the authorization though. Right?
Right.  Per-user keys are the way that the domain delegates its 
authorization of specific addresses to other signers.

-Jim