Re: Good as the enemy of OK


On Tue, 11 Jan 2005 20:01:56 -0500, Sam Hartman wrote:

  I understand you can get headers to replay.  It seems that defining a
  largish replay window (say 30 days) and keeping enough information to
  uniquely identify a message from this replay window is an option worth
  considering.


serious spammers work within windows measured in hours or, at most, relatively 
few days.


d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker  a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: Good as the enemy of OK, (continued) Re: Good as the enemy of OK, Sam Hartman Re: Good as the enemy of OK, John R Levine Re: Good as the enemy of OK, Tony Finch Re: Good as the enemy of OK, John Levine Re: Good as the enemy of OK, Tony Finch Re: Good as the enemy of OK, Douglas Otis Re: Good as the enemy of OK, william(at)elan.net Re: Good as the enemy of OK, Douglas Otis Re: Good as the enemy of OK, william(at)elan.net Re: Good as the enemy of OK, Douglas Otis Re: Good as the enemy of OK, Dave Crocker <= Re: Good as the enemy of OK, Sam Hartman Re: Good as the enemy of OK, Miles Libbey Re: Good as the enemy of OK, Jim Fenton RE: Good as the enemy of OK, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: Good as the enemy of OK, Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Previous by Date:	Re: Good as the enemy of OK, Michael Thomas
Next by Date:	Re: Good as the enemy of OK, Sam Hartman
Previous by Thread:	Re: Good as the enemy of OK, Douglas Otis
Next by Thread:	Re: Good as the enemy of OK, Sam Hartman
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]