Since the current focus is on getting the working groups chartered, perhaps we should make that list the first thing to do after chartering?Well, nothing says we cannot use an issue tracker to track charter issues...
Particularly since I have attempted to raise charter issues that have been ignored several times already. I do not want to have to submit my own alternative charter proposal.
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: draft-allman-dkim-base-00 6.6: Advice given would invalidate the DKIM signature., Earl Hood |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: dkim-base-00: misc. comments, Earl Hood |
Previous by Thread: | revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker |
Next by Thread: | RE: Issue tracking (was: revised Proposed Charter), Dave Crocker |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |