IETF Mailsig (date)
July 31, 2005
- Re: PEM and mail signature DNS public key verification, william(at)elan.net, 21:42
- Re: PEM and mail signature DNS public key verification, william(at)elan.net, 21:27
- Re: SSP - policy location compatibility with DK, william(at)elan.net, 20:36
- Re: PEM and mail signature DNS public key verification, Earl Hood, 16:26
- Re: SSP outbound signing policy, Earl Hood, 16:22
- Re: SSP - policy location compatibility with DK, Arvel Hathcock, 15:39
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, James Scott, 15:29
- Re: Comments on draft-allman-dkim-base-00.txt, Ned Freed, 15:22
- Re: SSP - policy location compatibility with DK, Jim Fenton, 15:06
- RE: The cost of choices, James Scott, 15:05
- Re: Comments on draft-allman-dkim-base-00.txt, Thomas Roessler, 14:52
- Re: SSP outbound signing policy, Jim Fenton, 14:51
- IPR disclosures?, Thomas Roessler, 14:33
- Re: Comments on draft-allman-dkim-base-00.txt, Earl Hood, 14:24
- Re: The cost of choices, Earl Hood, 14:24
- PEM and mail signature DNS public key verification, william(at)elan.net, 13:47
- RE: accreditation, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:36
- Re: The cost of choices, Michael Thomas, 09:47
- Re: accreditation, Michael Thomas, 09:24
- RE: Comments on draft-allman-dkim-base-00.txt, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:02
- Re: Comments on draft-allman-dkim-base-00.txt, william(at)elan.net, 08:50
- Re: Comments on draft-allman-dkim-base-00.txt, Michael Thomas, 08:44
- Typo in html version of draft-allman-dkim-base-00, Amir Herzberg, 08:30
- Re: Comments on draft-allman-dkim-base-00.txt, Thomas Roessler, 08:12
- Re: Comments on draft-allman-dkim-base-00.txt, Michael Thomas, 08:12
- Re: The cost of choices, Dave Crocker, 05:48
- Re: Comments on draft-allman-dkim-base-00.txt, EKR, 03:02
- Re: Comments on draft-allman-dkim-base-00.txt, Earl Hood, 01:57
- RE: alternate key server mechanisms, william(at)elan.net, 01:17
July 30, 2005
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Earl Hood, 22:47
- Re: SSP outbound signing policy, Earl Hood, 22:15
- Comments on draft-allman-dkim-base-00.txt, EKR, 22:13
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net, 22:02
- RE: MASS BOF: things to accomplish, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:36
- Re: DKIM KEY SSP Override Option [was Re: The cost of choices], Jim Fenton, 13:15
- Re: SSP outbound signing policy, Jim Fenton, 10:00
- Re: SSP - when to perform, Jim Fenton, 09:59
- Re: SSP outbound signing policy, Jim Fenton, 09:56
- Re: DKIM KEY SSP Override Option [was Re: The cost of choices], Jim Fenton, 09:56
- MASS BOF: things to accomplish, Sam Hartman, 09:25
- RE: alternate key server mechanisms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:48
- RE: alternate key server mechanisms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 05:39
- RE: The cost of choices, Dave Crocker, 04:12
- RE: alternate key server mechanisms, Dave Crocker, 03:47
- RE: alternate key server mechanisms, Dave Crocker, 03:47
- Re: accreditation, Dave Crocker, 03:47
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 03:47
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 03:47
July 29, 2005
- Re: The cost of choices, Earl Hood, 21:10
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Ned Freed, 20:01
- RE: SSP - specifying the third-parties, william(at)elan.net, 17:49
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Douglas Otis, 17:28
- Re: SSP - 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, william(at)elan.net, 16:22
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net, 15:43
- Re: SSP outbound signing policy, Michael Thomas, 15:12
- Re: SSP - 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Michael Thomas, 15:09
- Re: The cost of choices, Michael Thomas, 15:04
- Re: SSP - 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Earl Hood, 14:47
- Re: SSP - 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Earl Hood, 14:45
- Re: SSP outbound signing policy, Earl Hood, 14:39
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Michael Thomas, 14:39
- Re: SSP - 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Hector Santos, 14:38
- Re: The cost of choices, Earl Hood, 14:35
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Douglas Otis, 14:21
- Re: SSP - 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Hector Santos, 14:18
- Re: DNS stuff (was Re: revised Proposed Charter), Michael Thomas, 14:08
- Re: SSP outbound signing policy, Michael Thomas, 14:03
- Re: The cost of choices, Michael Thomas, 13:50
- Re: SSP - 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Michael Thomas, 13:36
- RE: SSP - 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:27
- Re: SSP - policy location compatibility with DK, Michael Thomas, 12:13
- Re: DKIM KEY SSP Override Option [was Re: The cost of choices], Michael Thomas, 12:06
- Re: SSP - 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Michael Thomas, 11:51
- Re: SSP - 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Earl Hood, 10:14
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:58
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 06:45
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton, 02:51
July 28, 2005
- Re: SSP - 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Hector Santos, 23:17
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 22:24
- DKIM KEY SSP Override Option [was Re: The cost of choices], Hector Santos, 22:23
- Re: SSP - 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Earl Hood, 22:11
- Re: The cost of choices, Jim Fenton, 21:23
- Re: SSP - 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Hector Santos, 20:45
- Re: The cost of choices, Hector Santos, 20:45
- Re: The cost of choices, Earl Hood, 18:53
- Re: SSP - 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Earl Hood, 18:52
- Re: The cost of choices, Earl Hood, 18:47
- Re: The cost of choices, Jim Fenton, 17:01
- Re: The cost of choices, Jim Fenton, 16:55
- Re: SSP - 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Arvel Hathcock, 16:45
- Re: SSP - 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Dave Crocker, 16:32
- SSP - 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Arvel Hathcock, 16:06
- RE: SSP - specifying the third-parties, James Scott, 15:32
- RE: alternate key server mechanisms, John R Levine, 15:32
- Re: 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Earl Hood, 13:23
- RE: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Edward Shallow, 13:22
- Re: SSP outbound signing policy, Earl Hood, 12:54
- 3rd party Signers - Definition/Usage, Hector Santos, 12:45
- Re: SSP outbound signing policy, Hector Santos, 11:44
- Re: SSP - policy location compatibility with DK, Arvel Hathcock, 11:44
- Re: SSP - policy location compatibility with DK, Arvel Hathcock, 11:36
- Re: SSP - when to perform, Hector Santos, 11:34
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Hector Santos, 11:05
- Re: SSP - policy location compatibility with DK, Arvel Hathcock, 10:58
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Arvel Hathcock, 10:32
- RE: alternate key server mechanisms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:24
- Re: alternate key server mechanisms, John Levine, 10:22
- Re: SSP - policy location compatibility with DK, Hector Santos, 10:21
- SSP - flags field, Arvel Hathcock, 10:05
- Re: SSP - specifying the third-parties, Arvel Hathcock, 10:01
- SSP - policy location compatibility with DK, Arvel Hathcock, 09:56
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 09:53
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 09:49
- Re: DNS stuff (was Re: revised Proposed Charter), Dave Crocker, 09:39
- Re: DNS stuff (was Re: revised Proposed Charter), Michael Thomas, 09:35
- Re: DNS stuff (was Re: revised Proposed Charter), Dave Crocker, 09:27
- Re: SSP - specifying the third-parties, Jim Fenton, 08:49
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton, 08:33
- RE: Re: alternate key server mechanisms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:27
- Re: Charter issues list, 7/27/2005, Jim Fenton, 08:22
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, wayne, 08:06
- Re: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, Frank Ellermann, 07:51
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Michael Thomas, 07:43
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Michael Thomas, 07:36
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Michael Thomas, 07:25
- Re: alternate key server mechanisms, Frank Ellermann, 07:13
- Re: Charter issues list, 7/27/2005, Frank Ellermann, 06:06
- RE: alternate key server mechanisms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 05:22
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Douglas Otis, 05:11
- DNS stuff (was Re: revised Proposed Charter), Andrew Newton, 04:56
- RE: SSP - specifying the third-parties, James Scott, 04:45
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton, 04:10
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton, 03:50
- Re: Charter issues list, 7/27/2005, Andrew Newton, 03:31
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net, 01:36
July 27, 2005
- Re: SSP - specifying the third-parties, Earl Hood, 23:44
- RE: SSP - specifying the third-parties, James Scott, 23:37
- FYI: Searchable ietf-mailsig archives available, Earl Hood, 23:26
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Jim Fenton, 23:24
- Re: Charter issues list, 7/27/2005, Earl Hood, 23:24
- Charter issues list, 7/27/2005, Jim Fenton, 23:10
- Re: SSP - specifying the third-parties, Arvel Hathcock, 23:01
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net, 22:54
- SSP - specifying the third-parties, Arvel Hathcock, 22:38
- Re: The cost of choices, Arvel Hathcock, 22:36
- Re: SSP - when to perform, Arvel Hathcock, 22:35
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock, 22:23
- RE: Spoofing revisited, James Scott, 22:22
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Earl Hood, 22:13
- Re: The cost of choices, Earl Hood, 22:07
- Re: SSP - when to perform, Earl Hood, 22:05
- Re: alternate key server mechanisms, John Levine, 22:01
- Re: Spoofing revisited, Arvel Hathcock, 21:57
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 21:56
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net, 21:55
- Re: Spoofing revisited, Earl Hood, 21:53
- Re: alternate key server mechanisms, Earl Hood, 21:53
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Arvel Hathcock, 21:43
- Re: SSP outbound signing policy, Arvel Hathcock, 21:37
- Re: dkim support for identity "assessment" mechanisms, Arvel Hathcock, 21:30
- SSP - when to perform, Arvel Hathcock, 21:13
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock, 21:04
- Re: alternate key server mechanisms, Arvel Hathcock, 20:59
- Re: dkim support for identity "assessment" mechanisms, John Levine, 20:57
- RE: Spoofing revisited, James Scott, 20:53
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Arvel Hathcock, 20:52
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net, 20:34
- Re: The cost of choices, Arvel Hathcock, 20:23
- Re: The cost of choices, Arvel Hathcock, 20:22
- Re: SSP outbound signing policy, Earl Hood, 20:02
- Re: Spoofing revisited, Arvel Hathcock, 19:43
- Re: The cost of choices, Earl Hood, 19:40
- Re: The cost of choices, Earl Hood, 19:34
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Earl Hood, 19:32
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock, 19:19
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Earl Hood, 19:16
- RE: alternate key server mechanisms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:14
- Re: Spoofing revisited, william(at)elan.net, 19:14
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:06
- Re: Spoofing revisited, Earl Hood, 19:01
- Re: SSP outbound signing policy, Hector Santos, 18:44
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Jim Fenton, 18:40
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Hector Santos, 18:16
- Re: alternate key server mechanisms, Douglas Otis, 18:00
- SSP outbound signing policy, Arvel Hathcock, 17:47
- Re: The cost of choices, Arvel Hathcock, 17:42
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net, 17:38
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Michael Thomas, 17:31
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net, 17:30
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock, 17:30
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Douglas Otis, 17:19
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 17:18
- RE: The cost of choices, James Scott, 17:17
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:15
- Re: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, Miles Libbey, 17:14
- Re: alternate key server mechanisms, Arvel Hathcock, 16:52
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Hector Santos, 16:49
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock, 16:28
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Hector Santos, 16:21
- Re: Spoofing revisited, Arvel Hathcock, 16:15
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net, 16:10
- Re: Spoofing revisited, Arvel Hathcock, 16:05
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:54
- Re: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, Michael Thomas, 15:54
- Spoofing revisited, Earl Hood, 15:48
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Michael Thomas, 15:48
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Arvel Hathcock, 15:47
- Re: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, Andrew Newton, 15:46
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton, 15:43
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Michael Thomas, 15:36
- Re: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, Dave Crocker, 15:36
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Andrew Newton, 15:35
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Hector Santos, 15:31
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Michael Thomas, 15:29
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 15:26
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 15:26
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:23
- Re: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, Andrew Newton, 15:21
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:13
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton, 15:09
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton, 15:06
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Dave Crocker, 15:00
- RE: alternate key server mechanisms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:52
- Re: Header field canonicalzation question, Arvel Hathcock, 14:52
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 14:52
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Earl Hood, 14:46
- Re: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, Dave Crocker, 14:45
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 14:44
- Re: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, Andrew Newton, 14:39
- RE: alternate key server mechanisms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:35
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Arvel Hathcock, 14:30
- Re: Header field canonicalzation question, Arvel Hathcock, 14:27
- Re: The cost of choices, Dave Crocker, 14:13
- Re: The cost of choices, Arvel Hathcock, 14:03
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton, 14:03
- Re: Policy Mechanisms, Arvel Hathcock, 13:49
- Re: alternate key server mechanisms, Arvel Hathcock, 13:49
- Re: alternate key server mechanisms, Arvel Hathcock, 13:48
- RE: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:02
- RE: dkim support for identity "assessment" mechanisms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:58
- RE: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, Kuhtz, Christian, 12:45
- Re: Policy Mechanisms, Douglas Otis, 12:43
- RE: dkim support for identity "assessment" mechanisms, william(at)elan.net, 12:29
- RE: dkim support for identity "assessment" mechanisms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:19
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, william(at)elan.net, 12:19
- Re: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, william(at)elan.net, 11:55
- Re: Is DKIM only for boundary MTAs? (was Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices), Michael Thomas, 11:54
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, william(at)elan.net, 11:46
- RE: alternate key server mechanisms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:43
- RE: alternate key server mechanism(s) vs. accreditation, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:25
- Re: Policy Mechanisms, william(at)elan.net, 11:23
- Re: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, Dave Crocker, 11:23
- RE: Policy Mechanisms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:11
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:10
- Is DKIM only for boundary MTAs? (was Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices), Earl Hood, 11:10
- dkim support for identity "assessment" mechanisms, Dave Crocker, 11:03
- Re: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, william(at)elan.net, 10:47
- alternate key server mechanisms, Dave Crocker, 10:36
- Re: Policy Mechanisms, Douglas Otis, 10:32
- alternate key server mechanism(s) vs. accreditation, Dave Crocker, 10:31
- alternate key server mechanism(s) vs. accreditation, Dave Crocker, 10:31
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 10:31
- Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Hector Santos, 10:30
- NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, Dave Crocker, 10:10
- RE: Policy Mechanisms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:16
- Re: Policy Mechanisms, Michael Thomas, 09:04
- Policy Mechanisms, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:59
- Re: The cost of choices, Arvel Hathcock, 08:40
- Re: The cost of choices, Dave Crocker, 08:25
- Re: The cost of choices, Michael Thomas, 08:15
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:03
- RE: The cost of choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:57
- Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Arvel Hathcock, 07:35
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Arvel Hathcock, 07:33
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, SM, 07:16
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Thomas Roessler, 04:34
July 26, 2005
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, John R Levine, 22:17
- Re: The cost of choices, Hector Santos, 22:16
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hector Santos, 22:12
- Re: The cost of choices, william(at)elan.net, 21:47
- RE: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Dave Crocker, 21:13
- The cost of choices, Dave Crocker, 21:12
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 20:04
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:53
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, James Scott, 19:08
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:12
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Michael Thomas, 14:35
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:27
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:19
- RE: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:01
- Header field canonicalzation question, Bryan Costales, 13:00
- Re: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Earl Hood, 10:12
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Earl Hood, 10:11
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Michael Thomas, 10:10
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, wayne, 09:49
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Ned Freed, 09:43
- Re: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Ned Freed, 09:35
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, william(at)elan.net, 09:22
- Re: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Thomas Roessler, 08:23
- Re: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, SM, 08:04
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Arvel Hathcock, 06:29
- Re: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Arvel Hathcock, 06:29
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 06:28
- Re: PROCEDURAL ISSUE: RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Arvel Hathcock, 06:17
- Re: PROCEDURAL ISSUE: RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 06:14
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Arvel Hathcock, 06:07
- Re: PROCEDURAL ISSUE: RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Thomas Roessler, 04:04
- Re: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Frank Ellermann, 03:58
July 25, 2005
- Re: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Hector Santos, 23:29
- Re: QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Hector Santos, 23:12
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Frank Ellermann, 22:49
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hector Santos, 22:46
- QUERY: Relationshipt to other IETF work, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 22:34
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, wayne, 19:27
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, James Scott, 18:36
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Douglas Otis, 18:19
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, James Scott, 18:17
- PROCEDURAL ISSUE: RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:13
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:55
- Re: accreditation, Michael Thomas, 16:45
- RE: accreditation, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:32
- Re: accreditation, Michael Thomas, 15:53
- RE: accreditation, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:50
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Earl Hood, 14:27
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Earl Hood, 14:15
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Earl Hood, 13:39
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Earl Hood, 13:19
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, SM, 12:26
- RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Dennis Dayman, 12:16
- Re: DKIM Body Count/Length, Michael Thomas, 12:16
- Re: DKIM Body Count/Length, Hector Santos, 11:50
- accreditation, Michael Thomas, 11:34
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Arvel Hathcock, 11:29
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Douglas Otis, 11:19
- Re: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Ned Freed, 11:18
- QUERY: Key Server Choices, Dave Crocker, 11:07
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:49
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net, 09:02
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Michael Thomas, 07:57
- Re: DKIM Body Count/Length, Michael Thomas, 07:24
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, James Scott, 03:06
July 24, 2005
- DKIM Body Count/Length, Hector Santos, 22:42
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Earl Hood, 21:19
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Sam Hartman, 20:11
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, James Scott, 16:50
- Re: Domainkeys TM (was Re: DKIM - Selector), Jim Fenton, 09:25
- DKIM - New form of Social Engineering Spam?, Hector Santos, 07:34
- Domainkeys TM (was Re: DKIM - Selector), domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 00:23
July 22, 2005
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Earl Hood, 18:18
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Jim Fenton, 16:37
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock, 15:29
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Ned Freed, 15:08
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock, 14:49
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Nathaniel Borenstein, 14:33
- Re: Suggestion: assigning DKIM o= policy names, Arvel Hathcock, 14:21
- Re: Suggestion: assigning DKIM o= policy names, Jim Fenton, 14:16
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Jim Fenton, 14:00
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock, 13:38
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net, 12:53
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:46
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Jim Fenton, 12:22
- Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, SM, 09:20
July 21, 2005
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Douglas Otis, 16:51
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Ned Freed, 15:40
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 15:25
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 14:56
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:49
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Michael Thomas, 14:39
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Thomas Roessler, 14:26
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 14:15
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton, 13:58
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Earl Hood, 13:22
- RE: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:44
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Douglas Otis, 12:34
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:32
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:24
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:21
- Re: DKIM - Selector, william(at)elan.net, 12:06
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, wayne, 11:50
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Hector Santos, 11:06
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Michael Thomas, 10:49
- RE: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:31
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 10:25
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:10
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net, 09:29
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Ned Freed, 09:16
- Re: Suggestion: assigning DKIM o= policy names, Arvel Hathcock, 09:16
- Re: Content-Digest: Digesting raw vs MIME encoded data, william(at)elan.net, 09:15
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Tony Hansen, 08:37
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Nathaniel Borenstein, 08:21
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:48
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:27
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 07:11
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 06:37
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 05:59
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Thomas Roessler, 02:57
- Re: Content-Digest: Digesting raw vs MIME encoded data, Thomas Roessler, 02:36
July 20, 2005
- Suggestion: assigning DKIM o= policy names, Hector Santos, 23:03
- Re: draft-allman-dkim-base-00 6.6: Advice given would invalidate the DKIM signature., Jim Fenton, 22:56
- Re: Restricted Third Party Signing Policy, Jim Fenton, 22:39
- Restricted Third Party Signing Policy, James Scott, 22:03
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Earl Hood, 21:29
- Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, Earl Hood, 21:22
- Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Earl Hood, 21:11
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Frank Ellermann, 20:35
- Re: XINDX, Frank Ellermann, 19:55
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Frank Ellermann, 18:53
- Re: DKIM - Selector, Arvel Hathcock, 18:36
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton, 18:31
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Douglas Otis, 18:30
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock, 18:14
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock, 18:14
- Re: Content-Digest: Digesting raw vs MIME encoded data, william(at)elan.net, 17:54
- Re: DKIM o=$ Outbound Signing Policy Suggestion, Hector Santos, 17:25
- Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, Dave Crocker, 17:20
- Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, Dave Crocker, 17:18
- Re: DKIM - Selector, Jim Fenton, 17:04
- Re: DKIM o=$ Outbound Signing Policy Suggestion, Jim Fenton, 16:37
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, william(at)elan.net, 16:15
- Re: DKIM x= Signature Expiration - Domain Expiration Required?, Michael Thomas, 16:13
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Arvel Hathcock, 15:59
- DKIM x= Signature Expiration - Domain Expiration Required?, Hector Santos, 15:58
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Eric Allman, 15:53
- DKIM o=$ Outbound Signing Policy Suggestion, Hector Santos, 15:26
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Hector Santos, 14:53
- Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Hector Santos, 14:24
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Michael Thomas, 13:50
- Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, Michael Thomas, 13:32
- Re: draft-allman-dkim-base-00 6.6: Advice given would invalidate the DKIM signature., Eric Allman, 13:05
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, SM, 12:57
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Douglas Otis, 12:37
- RE: nowsp considered harmful, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:10
- Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, SM, 12:07
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Thomas Roessler, 11:55
- RE: Issue tracking (was: revised Proposed Charter), Dave Crocker, 11:28
- Real use cases for justify nowsp? (was Re: nowsp considered harmful), Earl Hood, 10:57
- Re: dkim-base-00: misc. comments, Earl Hood, 10:52
- RE: Issue tracking (was: revised Proposed Charter), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:48
- Re: draft-allman-dkim-base-00 6.6: Advice given would invalidate the DKIM signature., Earl Hood, 10:45
- Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, Earl Hood, 10:43
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Douglas Otis, 10:34
- Issue tracking (was: revised Proposed Charter), Ned Freed, 10:31
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Thomas Roessler, 10:13
- Re: DKIM - DNS RR, william(at)elan.net, 09:01
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Dave Crocker, 08:45
- Re: DKIM - Selector, william(at)elan.net, 08:42
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, william(at)elan.net, 08:38
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Michael Thomas, 08:37
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:36
- Re: DKIM - Header Fields, william(at)elan.net, 08:36
- XINDX, Dave Crocker, 08:33
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Thomas Roessler, 08:26
- RE: nowsp considered harmful, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:20
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net, 08:13
- Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, SM, 08:05
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 07:44
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Michael Thomas, 07:39
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 07:29
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Michael Thomas, 07:25
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Tony Hansen, 07:23
- Re: revised Proposed Charter, Ned Freed, 07:15
- RE: nowsp considered harmful, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:12
- RE: revised Proposed Charter, Kuhtz, Christian, 07:10
- revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 06:57
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Tony Hansen, 06:22
- dkim-base-00: misc. comments, Thomas Roessler, 01:55
- Re: nowsp considered harmful, Frank Ellermann, 01:53
- draft-allman-dkim-base-00 6.6: Advice given would invalidate the DKIM signature., Thomas Roessler, 01:22
- nowsp considered harmful, Thomas Roessler, 01:05
July 19, 2005
- DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, Earl Hood, 23:19
- Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Earl Hood, 21:53
- Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Arvel Hathcock, 20:24
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Arvel Hathcock, 18:50
- Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Arvel Hathcock, 18:39
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Arvel Hathcock, 18:21
- Re: Additional Key Management Methods RE: DKIM - DNS RR, Arvel Hathcock, 18:09
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Earl Hood, 18:05
- Re: Goldilocks Canonicalization, Arvel Hathcock, 18:03
- Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Hector Santos, 16:05
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Jon Callas, 15:11
- RE: DKIM - Header Fields, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:47
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Douglas Otis, 14:42
- RE: DKIM - DNS RR, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:28
- Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Arvel Hathcock, 13:31
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 11:53
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Douglas Otis, 10:53
- Additional Key Management Methods RE: DKIM - DNS RR, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:20
- RE: DKIM - Version, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:12
- Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Thomas Roessler, 08:30
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, william(at)elan.net, 07:22
July 18, 2005
- Re: DKIM - Header Fields, william(at)elan.net, 22:04
- RE: DKIM - Version, william(at)elan.net, 21:30
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Arvel Hathcock, 20:51
- Re: DKIM - DNS RR, Arvel Hathcock, 20:22
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, wayne, 19:31
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Murray S. Kucherawy, 19:09
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Murray S. Kucherawy, 19:04
- Re: Goldilocks Canonicalization, Douglas Otis, 18:24
- Re: DKIM - DNS RR, william(at)elan.net, 18:19
- Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Ned Freed, 18:18
- Goldilocks Canonicalization, Michael Thomas, 17:13
- Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Arvel Hathcock, 16:50
- Re: DKIM - DNS RR, Arvel Hathcock, 16:40
- Re: DKIM - Selector, Michael Thomas, 16:31
- Re: DKIM - Header Fields, Arvel Hathcock, 16:11
- Re: DKIM - Selector, Arvel Hathcock, 15:49
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Douglas Otis, 15:28
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Earl Hood, 14:54
- Re: DKIM - Version, Jim Fenton, 14:47
- Re: MASS Proposals Comparison Matrix, william(at)elan.net, 13:53
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Earl Hood, 13:44
- Re: DKIM - Other Inconsistancies, william(at)elan.net, 13:39
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Earl Hood, 13:35
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:33
- Re: MASS Proposals Comparison Matrix, Earl Hood, 13:28
- Re: DKIM - DNS RR, william(at)elan.net, 13:24
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 13:18
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 13:14
- RE: DKIM - Version, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:12
- Re: DKIM - Header Fields, william(at)elan.net, 13:06
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 13:00
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 12:55
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 12:54
- Re: DKIM - Version, william(at)elan.net, 12:44
- Re: DKIM - Selector, william(at)elan.net, 12:35
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Frank Ellermann, 12:04
- Re: MASS Proposals Comparison Matrix, william(at)elan.net, 12:00
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Arvel Hathcock, 11:38
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Jim Fenton, 11:36
- Re: MASS Proposals Comparison Matrix, Arvel Hathcock, 11:20
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Jim Fenton, 11:15
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Miles Libbey, 10:54
- Re: MASS Proposals Comparison Matrix, william(at)elan.net, 09:56
- Re: MASS Proposals Comparison Matrix, Douglas Otis, 09:35
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Douglas Otis, 09:07
- MASS Proposals Comparison Matrix, william(at)elan.net, 09:06
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Dave Crocker, 08:59
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 08:42
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Michael Thomas, 08:15
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Dave Crocker, 08:14
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 08:10
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Michael Thomas, 08:05
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Arvel Hathcock, 08:01
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Arvel Hathcock, 08:01
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Michael Thomas, 07:53
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 07:41
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Michael Thomas, 07:31
- operations and development dkim mailing lists, Dave Crocker, 07:21
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Michael Thomas, 07:07
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Tony Hansen, 05:07
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Tony Hansen, 04:53
- Re: DKIM, Tony Hansen, 04:12
July 17, 2005
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 23:49
- Content-Digest: Digesting raw vs MIME encoded data, Earl Hood, 23:32
- Re: DKIM, Jim Fenton, 23:08
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 22:44
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 22:06
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 22:01
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Earl Hood, 21:59
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 21:15
- Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Dave Crocker, 21:08
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 21:06
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 21:03
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 20:54
- Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Earl Hood, 20:49
- Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Ned Freed, 20:08
- Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Douglas Otis, 19:36
- Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Dave Crocker, 18:34
- Re: DKIM, Tony Hansen, 18:22
- Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Ned Freed, 18:10
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 17:11
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 17:08
- RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:54
- RE: wildcards, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 16:52
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Ned Freed, 16:32
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Dave Crocker, 16:30
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 16:05
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Ned Freed, 15:28
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 15:27
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Tony Hansen, 13:16
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 12:01
- Re: wildcards, Michael Thomas, 11:34
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 11:23
- Re: wildcards, John Levine, 11:05
- Re: Content-Digest: TEXT canonicalization, Earl Hood, 10:52
- Re: Content-Digest: MIMEFORM canonicalization, Earl Hood, 10:19
- RE: Proposed change to proposed Charter, Dennis Dayman, 09:57
- Re: Content-Digest: TEXT canonicalization, william(at)elan.net, 09:39
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Earl Hood, 09:20
- Re: Content-Digest: MIMEFORM canonicalization, william(at)elan.net, 09:13
- Re: wildcards, william(at)elan.net, 08:35
- Re: wildcards, william(at)elan.net, 08:02
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, william(at)elan.net, 07:38
- Re: wildcards, John Levine, 06:13
- RE: Why DKIM useful and different from PGP or S/MIME, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 04:58
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 00:45
- Re: Proposed change to proposed Charter, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 00:31
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 00:28
July 16, 2005
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 23:58
- Content-Digest: TEXT canonicalization, Earl Hood, 22:57
- Content-Digest: MIMEFORM canonicalization, Earl Hood, 22:50
- Re: IPR declaration requirement, william(at)elan.net, 18:51
- Re: Proposed change to proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 17:07
- Re: Proposed change to proposed Charter, Douglas Otis, 16:05
- Re: IPR declaration requirement, Ned Freed, 15:17
- Re: Proposed change to proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 15:00
- Re: Proposed change to proposed Charter, Douglas Otis, 14:21
- Options and alternatives, Dave Crocker, 12:51
- Why DKIM useful and different from PGP or S/MIME, Dave Crocker, 12:45
- Proposed change to proposed Charter, Dave Crocker, 12:37
- IPR declaration requirement, Dave Crocker, 12:25
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Michael Thomas, 12:11
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 11:13
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, wayne, 10:48
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, SM, 10:03
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, SM, 09:46
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Michael Thomas, 09:00
- Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Ned Freed, 08:30
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Ned Freed, 08:19
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Michael Thomas, 07:22
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Douglas Otis, 00:06
July 15, 2005
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, wayne, 19:32
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Frank Ellermann, 18:33
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Earl Hood, 17:56
- RE: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 17:17
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:54
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:49
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Murray S. Kucherawy, 16:29
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Tony Hansen, 16:09
- Re: wildcards, was dkim technology?, Michael Thomas, 15:43
- Re: wildcards, william(at)elan.net, 14:47
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hector Santos, 14:46
- Re: wildcards, was dkim technology?, John R Levine, 14:26
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 14:10
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Earl Hood, 13:17
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, william(at)elan.net, 13:17
- Re: DKIM, Frank Ellermann, 13:15
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Jim Fenton, 12:42
- Re: DKIM, wayne, 12:40
- RE: DKIM, william(at)elan.net, 12:30
- Re: DKIM: signer address, Jim Fenton, 12:28
- Re: wildcards, Frank Ellermann, 12:24
- RE: DKIM, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:23
- Re: DKIM, Jim Fenton, 12:20
- Re: DKIM: t=SecondsSince1970, william(at)elan.net, 11:49
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Murray S. Kucherawy, 11:35
- Re: DKIM: t=SecondsSince1970, wayne, 11:34
- RE: wildcards, was dkim technology?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 11:27
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Earl Hood, 11:25
- Re: DKIM, wayne, 11:20
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Earl Hood, 11:19
- Re: DKIM: Key revocation, Douglas Otis, 11:15
- Re: DKIM: t=SecondsSince1970, Earl Hood, 11:12
- Re: wildcards, was dkim technology?, Michael Thomas, 11:11
- Re: wildcards, was dkim technology?, william(at)elan.net, 10:47
- Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Earl Hood, 10:46
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, william(at)elan.net, 10:41
- Re: wildcards, Frank Ellermann, 10:33
- RE: Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:20
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, william(at)elan.net, 10:19
- Re: wildcards, was dkim technology?, John R Levine, 10:18
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Frank Ellermann, 10:13
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Frank Ellermann, 09:50
- Re: DKIM: t=SecondsSince1970, Michael Thomas, 09:24
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Michael Thomas, 09:20
- Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Michael Thomas, 09:14
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Tony Hansen, 09:09
- RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, william(at)elan.net, 08:41
- Re: wildcards, was dkim technology?, Michael Thomas, 08:35
- Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), william(at)elan.net, 08:29
- RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:28
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Michael Thomas, 08:20
- Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Michael Thomas, 08:17
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, wayne, 08:10
- Re: wildcards, was dkim technology?, wayne, 08:10
- Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Tony Hansen, 08:04
- RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 07:53
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Frank Ellermann, 07:51
- Re: DKIM: Key revocation, Michael Thomas, 06:29
- Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), william(at)elan.net, 05:48
- RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, william(at)elan.net, 05:19
- Re: DKIM: t=SecondsSince1970, william(at)elan.net, 05:04
- Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), william(at)elan.net, 04:52
- Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Earl Hood, 01:23
- DKIM: signer address, Earl Hood, 00:57
- DKIM: Authentication-Results, Earl Hood, 00:49
- Re: DKIM: Key revocation, Earl Hood, 00:42
- Re: DKIM: t=SecondsSince1970, Earl Hood, 00:20
- Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood, 00:15
- Re: wildcards, was dkim technology?, John Levine, 00:01
July 14, 2005
- DKIM: Canonicalization, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 23:54
- DKIM: Key revocation, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 23:29
- DKIM: t=SecondsSince1970, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 23:23
- DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 23:13
- Re: dkim technology?, Douglas Otis, 21:15
- Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Earl Hood, 19:59
- Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Earl Hood, 19:43
- RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:05
- RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 18:34
- RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:34
- RE: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:24
- RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 18:05
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Ned Freed, 17:37
- Re: Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Ned Freed, 17:20
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, wayne, 16:48
- Re: DKIM licensing, wayne, 16:32
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 16:26
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, wayne, 16:23
- Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Earl Hood, 16:21
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, william(at)elan.net, 16:04
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 16:02
- Re: DKIM licensing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 15:54
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, wayne, 15:40
- Re: DKIM licensing, wayne, 15:35
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 15:06
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 15:05
- Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, william(at)elan.net, 14:53
- MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker, 14:49
- [Sam Hartman] Please post BOF agenda and proposed charter, Sam Hartman, 14:22
- Re: DKIM licensing, Dave Crocker, 12:55
- Re: DKIM licensing, Sam Hartman, 12:38
- Re: dkim technology?, wayne, 12:15
- Re: dkim technology?, Dave Crocker, 11:31
- Re: DKIM licensing, Justin Mason, 11:20
- Re: dkim technology?, wayne, 11:18
- Re: DKIM licensing, Chip Mefford, 10:54
- Re: DKIM licensing, Andrew Newton, 10:35
- Re: DKIM licensing, Dave Crocker, 10:22
- Re: DKIM licensing, Dave Crocker, 10:18
- Re: DKIM licensing, Chip Mefford, 10:10
- Re: DKIM licensing, Jim Fenton, 09:58
- Re: DKIM licensing, william(at)elan.net, 09:51
- dkim technology?, Dave Crocker, 09:36
- Re: DKIM licensing, Dave Crocker, 09:35
- Re: DKIM licensing, william(at)elan.net, 09:17
- Re: DKIM licensing, Dave Crocker, 09:04
- Re: DKIM licensing, Arvel Hathcock, 09:02
- Re: DKIM licensing, David Woodhouse, 08:53
- Re: DKIM licensing, Murray S. Kucherawy, 08:39
- Re: DKIM licensing, David Woodhouse, 01:14
July 11, 2005
- Re: DKIM, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 22:14
- Re: DKIM, william(at)elan.net, 21:39
- Re: DKIM, Arvel Hathcock, 15:29
- Re: DKIM, Andrew Newton, 12:26
- Re: DKIM, william(at)elan.net, 08:24
- Re: DKIM, Dave Crocker, 06:44
- Content-Digest & Edigest fields draft, william(at)elan.net, 06:32
- Re: DKIM, Tony Hansen, 05:54
- Re: DKIM, Michael Weiner, 05:17
- Re: DKIM, william(at)elan.net, 04:28
- Re: DKIM, David Woodhouse, 04:15
- Re: DKIM, wayne, 04:04
July 10, 2005
- DKIM, Dave Crocker, 21:41
July 06, 2005
- Re: What am I missing?, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 23:08
- Re: What am I missing?, wayne, 22:54
- Re: What am I missing?, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 22:40
- Re: What am I missing?, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 22:29
- Re: What am I missing?, Hector Santos, 22:11
- Re: What am I missing?, wayne, 22:11
- Re: What am I missing?, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 21:48
- Re: What am I missing?, wayne, 21:03
- Re: What am I missing?, Andrew Newton, 20:50
- Re: What am I missing?, Andrew Newton, 20:45
- Re: What am I missing?, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 20:38
- Re: What am I missing?, Claus Assmann, 20:17
- Re: What am I missing?, Andrew Newton, 20:11
- Re: What am I missing?, domainkeys-feedbackbase02, 19:54
- What am I missing?, Andrew Newton, 18:51