We intend to offer our C++ DKIM library open source under whatever license
is most appropriate. Would Apache do?
Arvel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin Mason" <jm(_at_)jmason(_dot_)org>
To: <ietf-mailsig(_at_)imc(_dot_)org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 12:49 PM
Subject: DKIM licensing
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hey all --
apologies if this is the wrong list for this. Regarding DKIM IP and RF
licensing, is there an updated license for DKIM implementors, or is
http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/license/patentlicense1-1.html still the
most appropriate?
(Just checking to see if we in the ASF need to get some legal eagles to
look over a new one, if it's been updated.)
BTW I wrote up a few thoughts about DKIM at
http://taint.org/2005/07/11/195049a.html . Broad summary: thumbs up! ;)
- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS
iD8DBQFC1VQ7MJF5cimLx9ARAiBaAKCF4E/KfeX0/S5+ZLHXDQsO1N6RRQCgklPd
lOZMxNnne91EC1VLA/ZK5N0=
=RIAd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----