ietf-mailsig
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: DKIM licensing

2005-07-13 19:55:31

We intend to offer our C++ DKIM library open source under whatever license is most appropriate. Would Apache do?

Arvel

----- Original Message ----- From: "Justin Mason" <jm(_at_)jmason(_dot_)org>
To: <ietf-mailsig(_at_)imc(_dot_)org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 12:49 PM
Subject: DKIM licensing



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


Hey all --

apologies if this is the wrong list for this.  Regarding DKIM IP and RF
licensing, is there an updated license for DKIM implementors, or is
http://domainkeys.sourceforge.net/license/patentlicense1-1.html still the
most appropriate?

(Just checking to see if we in the ASF need to get some legal eagles to
look over a new one, if it's been updated.)

BTW I wrote up a few thoughts about DKIM at
http://taint.org/2005/07/11/195049a.html .  Broad summary: thumbs up! ;)

- --j.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh CVS

iD8DBQFC1VQ7MJF5cimLx9ARAiBaAKCF4E/KfeX0/S5+ZLHXDQsO1N6RRQCgklPd
lOZMxNnne91EC1VLA/ZK5N0=
=RIAd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----







<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>