Tony Hansen wrote:
Yes, the interaction between DKIM's results and the Authentication-Results: header need to be better defined.
Bruce's last review of draft-kucherawy was horrible, to put it mildly. Is that an input document for the planned WG ? So far I'm under the impression that the author is not very interested to discuss it. Getting it in a shape where it could replace the similar [OT]-Received: header field would be nice. Bye, Frank
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Frank Ellermann |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: wildcards, was dkim technology?, John R Levine |
Previous by Thread: | Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Tony Hansen |
Next by Thread: | Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results, Tony Hansen |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |