Re: DKIM: Authentication-Results

Tony Hansen wrote:

> Yes, the interaction between DKIM's results and the
> Authentication-Results: header need to be better defined.

Bruce's last review of draft-kucherawy was horrible, to
put it mildly.  Is that an input document for the planned
WG ?  So far I'm under the impression that the author is
not very interested to discuss it.

Getting it in a shape where it could replace the similar
[OT]-Received: header field would be nice.

                            Bye, Frank