From: Hector Santos [mailto:hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com]
Phillip,
You could always proposed an extended DKIM implementation
that supports a A/R protocol.
I have, the publisher of a key record MAY at their option indicate the
accreditation(s) they have received.
If I read you correctly, I could agree that it needs to be
open-ended interface. But I don't agree it has to be
dependent on any existing A/R concept.
The interface mechanism should be open ended and allow for new A/R
concepts to be added.
This is actually the easy part, the new A/R protocol draft just has a
hook for requesting the necessary IANA assignment.
The only case that is hard is defining the linkage to existing
protocols. XKMS is already a standard, while it is clear that proposing
q=xkms means anything other than that the key can be obtained from an
XKMS server would be idiotic the tag assignment could be for xkms2,
xkms2_0 or something else.