The working group will NOT consider related topics, such as reputation and accreditation systems, and message encryption. The working group may however address issues arising from interoperation with already deployed protocols that address these issues.
I at least would like to fully understand why this shouldn't be part of the charter. It sounds perfectly reasonable to me.
-- Arvel
Previous by Date: | Re: Content-Digest: Digesting raw vs MIME encoded data, william(at)elan.net |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock |
Previous by Thread: | RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip |
Next by Thread: | Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |