On Jul 20, 2005, at 8:55 PM, Arvel Hathcock wrote:
The working group will NOT consider related topics,
such as reputation and accreditation systems, and
message encryption. The working group may however
address issues arising from interoperation with already
deployed protocols that address these issues.
I at least would like to fully understand why this shouldn't be
part of the charter. It sounds perfectly reasonable to me.
I think what Dave is trying to say is that defining the protocols and/
or features for reputation and accreditation systems is out of scope,
but that working on things in the DKIM protocol that interact with
existing reputation and accreditation systems is not out of scope.
-andy