Dave Crocker wrote:
It uses Ned's language concerning restriction of changes to
draft-allman-dkim-*
Is that the following ?
| The working group will make only the minimal changes deemed
| useful to improve the viability of services that are based
| on these specifications
I prefer s/minimal/necessary/ and an option to add other I-Ds
(Murray's, Phil's, or William's) as further input documents.
it states that the working group output will be
standards-track.
I don't see why it can't also create other proposals, it's
up to the IESG to decide about the final status. No way
to bypass IETF consensus for any WG output => no problem.
| Keys will be stored in the responsible identity's DNS
| hierarchy
Apparently there are other ideas, maybe add "most likely".
Bye, Frank