RE: revised Proposed Charter

 They don't count:

....

 *They are not standards track.


Phillip,

Operational impact concerns apply only to standards, and not to other 
mechanisms 
that gain substantial deployment and use?


  d/
  ---
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: revised Proposed Charter, (continued) RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net Re: revised Proposed Charter, Jim Fenton Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock Re: revised Proposed Charter, Ned Freed Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker <= RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Previous by Date:	RE: The cost of choices, James Scott
Next by Date:	Re: revised Proposed Charter, Douglas Otis
Previous by Thread:	RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Next by Thread:	RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]