Re: SSP outbound signing policy

----- Original Message -----
From: "Arvel Hathcock" <arvel(_at_)altn(_dot_)com>
To: <ietf-mailsig(_at_)imc(_dot_)org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 8:42 PM
Subject: SSP outbound signing policy


> Maybe we should add another policy of:
>
> o=?  WEAK (signature optional, no third party)
>
> Hector's legend for reference:
>
> o=~ NEUTRAL or RELAXED (signature optional [,No 3rd party?])
> o=-  STRONG  (signature required, 3rd party allowed)
> o=!  EXCLUSIVE (signature required, no 3rd party)
> o=.  NEVER  (no mail expected)
> o=^  USER

Right.  This is why I had the parenthetical 3rd party question mark in the
Neutral option. The specs does not specifically states neutral policy allows
for 3rd party signing.

I think your WEAK idea clears it up:

    o=?  WEAK (signature optional, no third party)
    o=~ NEUTRAL or RELAXED (signature optional, 3rd aparty allowed)

--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com