Re: SSP - policy location compatibility with DK

Arvel Hathcock wrote:

> > Suppose for example that a site signs all messages with only one of 
> > the algorithms (DK for example).  A receiver that is DKIM capable 
> > would end up using the senders DK policy and fail the mail.
>
>
> This assumes the sending site has a policy of "I sign all messages" of 
> course.  But what such a site _really_ means is "I sign all messages 
> *with DK*".   Yet a DKIM verifier wouldn't know the difference.  Isn't 
> this correct?

Arvel,

Is anyone publishing and/or using the DK signing policy?  If so, then 
our attempts at compatibility have backfired.

-Jim