It is possible to have same english terms assigned the outbound signing policy tags? Just ideas: o=~ NEUTRAL or RELAXED (signature optional [,No 3rd party?]) o=- STRONG (signature required, 3rd party allowed) o=! EXCLUSIVE (signature required, no 3rd party) o=. NEVER (no mail expected) o=^ USER It is easier to converse with someone that a domain has a "relaxed or neutral DKIM" policy" as opposed to a "o=~ DKIM policy" -- Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc. http://www.santronics.com
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: draft-allman-dkim-base-00 6.6: Advice given would invalidate the DKIM signature., Jim Fenton |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Content-Digest: Digesting raw vs MIME encoded data, Thomas Roessler |
| Previous by Thread: | DKIM x= Signature Expiration - Domain Expiration Required?, Hector Santos |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Suggestion: assigning DKIM o= policy names, Arvel Hathcock |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |