Yeah, I've already started using Hector's terminology when talking to my
tech support folks about DKIM.
--
Arvel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Fenton" <fenton(_at_)cisco(_dot_)com>
To: "Hector Santos" <hsantos(_at_)santronics(_dot_)com>
Cc: "IETF-MAILSIG" <ietf-mailsig(_at_)imc(_dot_)org>
Sent: Friday, July 22, 2005 4:16 PM
Subject: Re: Suggestion: assigning DKIM o= policy names
I like this. I have been using the word "stronger" to describe what
you're calling "exclusive", but I can change my habits.
-Jim
Hector Santos wrote:
It is possible to have same english terms assigned the outbound signing
policy tags?
Just ideas:
o=~ NEUTRAL or RELAXED (signature optional [,No 3rd party?])
o=- STRONG (signature required, 3rd party allowed)
o=! EXCLUSIVE (signature required, no 3rd party)
o=. NEVER (no mail expected)
o=^ USER
It is easier to converse with someone that a domain has a "relaxed or
neutral DKIM" policy" as opposed to a "o=~ DKIM policy"
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com