-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Nathaniel Borenstein wrote:
Also, Earl Hood wrote
Since DKIM makes allows digitally signing of message bodies,
there is an implicit indication that message content can be "protected"
via DKIM.
Implicit indications aren 't very helpful. But we can certainly say
that DKIM + base64 protects the content. Perhaps we should explicitly
recommend base64 for anyone who wants this kind of absolute fidelity?
I've long believed that if you don't use base64, you shouldn't expect
that kind of fidelity. -- Nathaniel
Except in the case of content consisting of type multipart/* or
message/*. Those can't be recursively encoded with base64 or
quoted-printable.
Tony Hansen
tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFC38EfxsSylYhzrRYRAl1aAJwOzRWmiLmHgnrNooN1LWNNfMN89QCdF3RK
woM3WsDtn5h21XnDMiF6zkY=
=xdzO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----