----- Original Message ----
So since you asked view on this subject - leave your rules for WG and keep only RFC3184 as applicable to this group at this time - BoF is supposed to be loosely organized group, more open to debate then WG (which has clear written goals). In other words, I'm against having the rules as they are written apply to MASS at this time.
In the real world, what harm is done by following the proposed rules?
Sounds rational to me. miles libbey
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: alternate key server mechanisms, Arvel Hathcock |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip |
Previous by Thread: | RE: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, Hallam-Baker, Phillip |
Next by Thread: | Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Hector Santos |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |