Noted.
I would suggest that the mailing list subscription Daemon be configured
to contain a note to this effect and that when the group is chartered we
restart the list.
I would very much prefer it if the IETF would follow the practice of
OASIS and W3C in this respect and have mandatory policies in this
respect and enforce them through their own mailing list infrastructure.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-ietf-mailsig(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org
[mailto:owner-ietf-mailsig(_at_)mail(_dot_)imc(_dot_)org] On Behalf Of Dave
Crocker
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 12:59 PM
To: ietf-mailsig
Cc: Russ Housley; Sam Hartman
Subject: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules
Importance: High
Folks,
Based on some public discussion on the IETF mailing list and
some quick web page
assemblage, there is now an explicit statement of the rules
for this mailing
list.
The rules are located at:
<http://mipassoc.org/mass/ietf-list-rules.html>
This note is both an assertion of the rules and a request for any
indication of
rough consensus AGAINST them.
As an assertion, this email serves the equivalent to the IPR "NOTE WELL"
statement used in the IETF. That is, it ensures that all participants
are
informed of the rules that are in force.
Note that the rules strictly involve IETF standard documents, so that
there is
absolutely nothing special about applying them to this group. If there
is rough
consensus NOT to use these rules, it is not clear under what rules the
list will
operate, to satisfy IETF requirements.
The rules impose requirements on all participants and they specify
courses of
actions when there are problems.
/Dave and Jim
---
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net