Hector Santos wrote:
Section 3.5 "The DKIM-Signature header field" describes the x= tag as a optional signature expiration time value. I am trying to understand why this value should be trusted and even if its fails due to expiration, how does the MTA handle this?
It should be trusted if the signature still verifies. If the signature is expired, it should be considered the same way as a missing and/or broken signatures. That is, as if it were not there at all. Mike
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Arvel Hathcock |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, william(at)elan.net |
Previous by Thread: | DKIM x= Signature Expiration - Domain Expiration Required?, Hector Santos |
Next by Thread: | Suggestion: assigning DKIM o= policy names, Hector Santos |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |