I think it seems a little silly but it's not harmful so I personally don't
care either way. It's sort of basically saying, "Hey, guess what! Some DNS
records are larger than others - yeah, they're not all the same size." LOL.
DNS has well known constraints; we are operating within those constraints.
Someday there should be a "Friendly Advice" or "Take it from me brother!"
section in every RFC. If there were, this text would belong there rather
than in "Security Considerations" (just my opinion folks).
--
Arvel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dave Crocker" <dcrocker(_at_)bbiw(_dot_)net>
To: "Andrew Newton" <andy(_at_)hxr(_dot_)us>
Cc: "IETF MASS WG" <ietf-mailsig(_at_)imc(_dot_)org>
Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: revised Proposed Charter
Public keys stored in DNS records are much larger than DNS records
tnx.
how do folks feel about including this?
d/
---
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net