Perhaps the charter should be amended to reflect that alternative (to the
default DNS) key retrieval mechanisms may be defined through future working
group process.
There is a benefit in having a charter cite possible future work, when there is
need to ensure that folks need reassurance that particular work has been
deferred rather than missed.
Absent that compelling concern, listing possible future work does not affect
current work and leads to infinite scenarios of trying to list all of the
future
work that might be done.
In other words, what is the practical benefit of making the change you are
suggesting?
d/
---
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
+1.408.246.8253
dcrocker a t ...
WE'VE MOVED to: www.bbiw.net