To protect against it would require some "tieing" tag to make the association, which may be considered "ugly".
Right. That's my view. The end result of making multiple headers per signature work seems less elegant than just fixing whatever problems are inherent to the single header design and sticking to that.
-- Arvel
| Previous by Date: | Re: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Spoofing revisited, James Scott |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Earl Hood |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Better DKIM Verification Example Needed, Michael Thomas |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |