Re: DKIM


Right.

        Tony Hansen
        tony(_at_)att(_dot_)com

Jim Fenton wrote:


I don't know where I got the notion that b= had to be last; thanks.
There is one ordering rule:  the v= tag/value in the key record must be
first.

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: DKIM, (continued) Re: DKIM, william(at)elan.net Re: DKIM, domainkeys-feedbackbase02 Re: DKIM, Andrew Newton Re: DKIM, Jim Fenton Re: DKIM, wayne Re: DKIM, Jim Fenton Re: DKIM, wayne Re: DKIM, Frank Ellermann Re: DKIM, Tony Hansen Re: DKIM, Jim Fenton Re: DKIM, Tony Hansen <= Re: DKIM - Selector, william(at)elan.net Re: DKIM - Selector, Arvel Hathcock Re: DKIM - Selector, Michael Thomas Re: DKIM - Selector, william(at)elan.net Re: DKIM - Selector, Jim Fenton Re: DKIM - Selector, Arvel Hathcock Re: DKIM - Selector, william(at)elan.net Domainkeys TM (was Re: DKIM - Selector), domainkeys-feedbackbase02 Re: Domainkeys TM (was Re: DKIM - Selector), Jim Fenton Re: DKIM - Version, william(at)elan.net

Previous by Date:	Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Earl Hood
Next by Date:	Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Tony Hansen
Previous by Thread:	Re: DKIM, Jim Fenton
Next by Thread:	Re: DKIM - Selector, william(at)elan.net
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]