Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
If the alternative also has these, please point to them. Absent them, the effort is far more open-ended.XKMS is a W3C Recommendation. It has met the criteria requiring twoindependent impelmentations.The effort required to link to XKMS is considerably less than the effortrequired to complete the dns retrieval mechanism.
You're surely not talking about development effort are you? Mike
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, Dave Crocker |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton |
Previous by Thread: | RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip |
Next by Thread: | RE: QUERY: Key Server Choices, Hallam-Baker, Phillip |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |