Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational

On July 18, 2005 at 07:52, Michael Thomas wrote:

> Are you suggesting these as additional caveats to section 5.2.1?

As the draft is organized now, that appears to be the place.  However,
I think the location could be better.  5.2.1 is under 5.2, which is
titled "Select a private-key and corresponding selector information."
Seems to be an odd place to have comments about canonicalization and
encoding message according to MIME specs.

--ewh