Re: nowsp considered harmful


On July 20, 2005 at 12:37, Douglas Otis wrote:

Earl's list is also a bit  
vague about white space at the end of a line.  I read that to mean  
white space preceding the CRLF.


Correct.

--ewh

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: nowsp considered harmful, (continued) Re: nowsp considered harmful, Tony Hansen Re: nowsp considered harmful, Michael Thomas Re: nowsp considered harmful, Michael Thomas Re: nowsp considered harmful, Thomas Roessler Re: nowsp considered harmful, Michael Thomas Re: nowsp considered harmful, Douglas Otis Re: nowsp considered harmful, Thomas Roessler Re: nowsp considered harmful, Douglas Otis Re: nowsp considered harmful, Michael Thomas Re: nowsp considered harmful, Douglas Otis Re: nowsp considered harmful, Earl Hood <= Re: nowsp considered harmful, Hector Santos Re: nowsp considered harmful, Dave Crocker Re: nowsp considered harmful, Thomas Roessler RE: nowsp considered harmful, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: nowsp considered harmful, Hallam-Baker, Phillip

Previous by Date:	Re: DKIM: Does DKIM provide adequate protection from a malicious domain from spoofing a sender's address?, Earl Hood
Next by Date:	Restricted Third Party Signing Policy, James Scott
Previous by Thread:	Re: nowsp considered harmful, Douglas Otis
Next by Thread:	Re: nowsp considered harmful, Hector Santos
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]