In the Vacation draft:
Alternatively, scripts can store records of who has received which
message, and never send a message to someone twice.
I think this should be "implementations can store", since there is no
facility in Sieve itself for storing this info.
"Vacation" MUST NOT respond to a message unless the user's email
address is in the "To" or "Cc" line of the original message.
Shouldn't the "Bcc" header be permitted, as well? Some mailers (not
many, I'll admit) generate a "Bcc" header. If you have vacation set
and I use one of these mailers to send mail to your buddy, and I bcc
you, I should get a vacation notice.
In "3.7. Restricting Replies to Automated Processes", I'd suggest
also saying that implementations MUST NOT respond to mail that has
any header fields which start with "List-".
Vacation does not affect the implicit keep.
This might be more clear if it said "Vacation, by itself, still
requires the implicit keep." I'm not sure, though.
--
Randall Gellens
Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only
-------------- Randomly-selected tag: ---------------
If you can't be a good example, at least be a horrible warning.