Ken Murchison wrote:
I was just asked what would happen if this extension is used on an
address such as:
user+detail1+detail2(_at_)canonicaldomain(_dot_)dom
I'm proposing adding the following text to the draft:
"NOTE: If the separator character occurs more than once in the
local-part,
then the address SHOULD be split at the left-most separator."
Does this seem sufficient? Should this be a MUST instead of a SHOULD?
Any other thoughts?
IMHO, this should be MUST and it is sufficient.
Cheers,
Alexey
__________________________________________
R & D, ACI Worldwide/MessagingDirect
Watford, UK
Work Phone: +44 1923 81 2877
Home Page: http://orthanc.ab.ca/mel
I speak for myself only, not for my employer.
__________________________________________