From: "Kjetil Torgrim Homme" <kjetilho(_at_)ifi(_dot_)uio(_dot_)no>
thanks. how about:
| The default comparator is "i;ascii-casemap"
+ The comparator only affects the result when certain modifiers are
+ used.
This is good.
I think that all elements of a syntax should be described where
the element was introduced. I was looking for section 4.1.2
comparators, and didn't find it.
well, the draft assumes familiarity with the base Sieve RFC. I could
stick in a "see [SIEVE] for more details on comparators", but it ought
to be implied. actually, even the default comparator could have been
left out since it is specified in RFC 3028, but I thought I'd just
make it clear since the text in the RFC is so centred on matching.
I wasn't refering to what comparators are in general. I was refering to
what comparators do in this action. The only place comparators were
mentioned was buried in the modifiers section of the action. The addition
you proposed certainly covers my concerns.
Thanks,
Wolfgang