Re: Last Call: Sieve -- Subaddress Extension to Proposed Standard

> I was just asked what would happen if this extension is used on an
> address such as:
> user+detail1+detail2(_at_)canonicaldomain(_dot_)dom

> I'm proposing adding the following text to the draft:
> "NOTE: If the separator character occurs more than once in the
> local-part,
> then the address SHOULD be split at the left-most separator."

> Does this seem sufficient?  Should this be a MUST instead of a SHOULD?
> Any other thoughts?
SHOULD seems sufficient. I see no reason we cannot add this during the
author 48 hour editing pass.

                                Ned