On Fri, 30 Jul 2004 ned(_dot_)freed(_at_)mrochek(_dot_)com wrote:
Random thought: Perhaps it is time to consider forming a sieve
working group. The goals of the group would be carefullly limited to:
(1) Progressing the base sieve specification to draft. (Note that this
means no significant changes or additions.)
(2) Finishing various sieve I-Ds already on the table.
What do people think about the idea?
I strongly support this idea -- I think that holding the working group
accountable for getting the drafts published is the only way we'll ever be
able to see any of these documents finished.
-Rob
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Rob Siemborski | Andrew Systems Group * Research Systems Programmer
PGP:0x5CE32FCC | Cyert Hall 207 * rjs3(_at_)andrew(_dot_)cmu(_dot_)edu *
412.268.7456
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK----
Version: 3.12
GCS/IT/CM/PA d- s+: a-- C++++$ ULS++++$ P+++$ L+++ E W+ N(-) o? K- w-- O-
M-- V-- PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP+ t+@ 5+++ X- R@ tv-- b+ DI+++ D++ G e++ h+ r- y?
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK-----