[Top] [All Lists]

Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sieve-vacation-00.txt

2005-03-21 11:31:58

I'm rather opposed to this extension as is. I see a possibility for enhancements here:
How about requiring vacation-supporting implementations having the ability (where possible, i.e. everywhere but on the MUA) to *reject* a message while sending a short message in the reject string or referring the sender to a web-page?
Also, why not change some SHOULDs to MUSTs, e.g. the ones in 3.6?