Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-sieve-vacation-00.txt2005-03-21 11:31:58I'm rather opposed to this extension as is. I see a possibility for enhancements here: http://www.spamcop.net/fom-serve/cache/329.html#responderHow about requiring vacation-supporting implementations having the ability (where possible, i.e. everywhere but on the MUA) to *reject* a message while sending a short message in the reject string or referring the sender to a web-page? Also, why not change some SHOULDs to MUSTs, e.g. the ones in 3.6?
|
|
||||||||||||||||