ietf-mta-filters
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Working Group Last Call: draft-ietf-sieve-editheader-00.txt

2005-04-05 08:16:53

On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 13:07 +0200, Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
It seems to me that banning removal/addition of certain fields 
simplifies life a lot without removing significant benefit: Message-ID, 
Content-Type, Content-Transfer-Encoding and MIME-Version.

Modifying those four fields adds so many corner cases to the 
implementations. Do we have to go there? Is it perhaps better to just 
say "editheader operations MUST NOT modify those four fields"?

sounds like a good idea.  here's one use case though:

I've seen quite a bit of e-mail from Russian users who use Hotmail with
KOI8-R, but Hotmail tags it as ISO 8859-1.  it would be useful to be
able to correct the Content-type header here, both to get correct
BODY-matching and to let the MUA view the e-mail properly.

I can't think of use cases for the other headers.
-- 
Kjetil T.