Hi Scott,
--On January 19, 2006 1:46:00 PM -0500 Scott Hollenbeck
<sah(_at_)428cobrajet(_dot_)net> wrote:
Thanks for the note, Ned. It leads me to two more specific questions:
Does the document need to describe the issues noted below in an
Internationalization Considerations section? It might make sense.
My feeling is that what Ned described would be better off being put in the
base spec revision rather than vacation, since its is applicable to base
spec actions and other extensions too. i.e. we don't need to add this
directly to vacation itself.
What do others on the list think?
--
Cyrus Daboo