[Top] [All Lists]

RE: IESG Review of draft-ietf-sieve-vacation

2006-01-24 18:58:56

-----Original Message-----
From: Cyrus Daboo [mailto:cyrus(_at_)daboo(_dot_)name] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 7:47 PM
To: Scott Hollenbeck; 'Ned Freed'
Cc: ietf-mta-filters(_at_)imc(_dot_)org
Subject: RE: IESG Review of draft-ietf-sieve-vacation

Hi Scott,

--On January 19, 2006 1:46:00 PM -0500 Scott Hollenbeck 
<sah(_at_)428cobrajet(_dot_)net> wrote:

Thanks for the note, Ned.  It leads me to two more specific 

Does the document need to describe the issues noted below in an 
Internationalization Considerations section?  It might make sense.

My feeling is that what Ned described would be better off 
being put in the base spec revision rather than vacation, 
since its is applicable to base spec actions and other 
extensions too. i.e. we don't need to add this directly to 
vacation itself.

What do others on the list think?

That seems like a reasonable approach.  If others agree, can it be captured
as an issue to be addressed?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>