On Tue, Jan 31, 2006 at 01:16:34PM -0500, Ken Murchison wrote:
Alexey Melnikov wrote:
This is possbile, but I think for all other tests the default comparator
doesn't depend on match type.
Well, i;ascii-numeric is a SHOULD for :count (per Relational), and I
don't see why this can't be a MUST for hasflag :count, or :count in
general).
Relational says:
The COUNT match type SHOULD only be used with numeric comparators.
which is quite different from saying that a different comparator should
be defaulted when using :count . I think that trying to induce
different default comparators depending on combination of options opens
up a can of worms; i.e. I would agree that the default comparator should
not depend on the match type.
mm