On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 05:10 -0700, Philip Guenther wrote:
The last open items are:
sorry, I want to add a small open item, a change in section 6,
Extensibility:
Extensions MUST state how they interact with constraints defined in
section 2.10, e.g., whether they cancel the implicit keep, and which
actions they are compatible and incompatible with.
+ An extension MUST NOT change the behavior of the "require" control
+ command.
(CAN NOT would sound better, but that's not in [KEYWORDS] :-)
reference to original suggestion:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.ietf.mta-filters/2030/focus=2037
I think this is OK, but do note that require "variables" changes
the semantics of subsequent strings. I don't want to have text that
forbids this or comparable extensions that modify semantics in some way.
Ned